We have been mulling over the idea of exceptions in ParaSail, and have pretty firmly concluded that they aren't worth the trouble. In a highly parallel language, with lots of threads, exception propagation across threads becomes a significant issue, and that is a nasty area in general. Also, exceptions can introduce many additional paths into a program, making thorough testing that much harder. And the whole business of declaring what exceptions might be propagated, and then deciding what to do if some other exception is propagated can create numerous maintenance headaches.
There is a feature in ParaSail as currently designed which provides some of the same capabilities of exceptions, but is particularly suited to parallel programming. This is the "exit with" statement, which allows a construct to be exited with one or more values specified as results, and at the same time terminating any other threads currently executing within the construct. For example, here is a loop implementing a parallel search of a tree with the first thread finding the desired node exiting and killing off all of the other threads as part of the "exit ... with" statement:
const Result : optional Tree_Id;
for T => Root then T.Left || T.Right
while T not null concurrent loop
if T.Value == Desired_Value then
// Found desired node, exit with its identifier
exit loop with (Result => T.Id);
end if;
end loop with (Result => null);
This declares a Result object of type Tree_Id. It then walks the tree in parallel, starting at Root and continuing with T.Left and T.Right concurrently. It continues until it reaches "null" on each branch, or some node is found with its Value component matching the Desired_Value. The value of Identifier at the end indicates the identifier of the node having the desired Value, or null to indicate that no node was found. The presence of optional in the declaration for Result indicates that its value might be null.
Supporting this kind of intentional "race" seems important in parallel programming, as many problems are amenable to a divide and conquer approach, but it is important that as soon as a solution is found, no further time is wasted searching other parts of the solution space. The "end ... with" phrase allows the specification of one or more results if the construct ends normally, as opposed to via an "exit ... with" (in this case, ending normally means all threads reach a null branch in the walk of the tree without finding the desired node). Effectively the "exit ... with" skips over the "end ... with" phrase.
So how does this all relate to exceptions? Well given the "exit ... with" capability, one can establish two or more threads, one which monitors for a failure condition, and the others which do the needed computation. The thread monitoring for a failure condition performs an "exit ... with" if it detects a failure, with the result indicating the nature of the failure, and as a side-effect killing off any remaining computation threads. If the normal computation succeeds, then an "exit ... with" giving the final result will kill off the monitoring thread. Note that the "exit ... with" statements must occur textually within the construct being exited, so it is visible whether such a premature exit can occur, unlike an exception which can arise deep within a call tree and be propagated out many levels.
As an example of the kind of failure condition which might be amenable to this kind of monitoring, imagine a resource manager object, which provides up to some fixed maximum of some kind of resource (e.g. storage) to code within a block. This resource manager (which is presumably of a concurrent type) could be passed down to operations called within the block for their use. Meanwhile, a separate monitoring thread would be created immediately within the block which would call an operation on the resource manager which would suspend the thread until the resource runs out, at which point it would be awakened with an appropriate indication of the resource exhaustion, and any other information that might be helpful in later diagnosis. On return from this Wait_For_Exhaustion operation, the monitoring thread would do an "exit block with (Result => Failure, ...)" or equivalent, to indicate that the computation required more resources than were provided. The code following the block would then be able to take appropriate action.
No comments:
Post a Comment